Airline Plotters sentenced and UK Courts emasculated by European Court of Human Rights

Yesterday’s conviction of three Muslim men - Ibrahim Savant, Arafat Khan and Waheed Zaman - for conspiracy to murder at Woolwich Crown Court demonstrates the reality of the Islamist terror threat in the UK. They had been part of the team that was being prepared for a simultaneous mass suicide bombing of transatlantic airliners which could have killed more than the 9/11 attacks, but thankfully it was disrupted before it could become a bloody reality.

'Martyrdom' (sic) Videos of two of the Plotters

There are many people who would have you believe that this threat is exaggerated and can somehow be attributed to ‘mistakes’ in the UK’s foreign policy, ‘institutional racism’ and other forms of ‘racism’ and Islamophobia. “If only”, such people think, “we could withdraw our troops from Muslim countries, punish the wicked Israelis for their vicious oppression of the Palestinians and create a Palestinian state, and stop being vile racists, then these innocent confused young men would return to being loving Muslims.” Such a perspective is of course warped and completely wrong.

Muslim zealots in the UK first felt bold enough to make their fundamental antipathy to our way of life manifest in their action of burning Rushdie’s Satanic Verses in Bradford on 14 January 1989. Thereafter, Muslims began to mobilise and organise politically in our country, forming the Muslim Parliament in 1992 and the Muslim Council of Britain in 1997. Many smaller Islamist groups have come and gone over the years, but since that moment of crystallisation of hostile intent to our way of life, they have been a permanent fixture of the political scene. Thereafter, our politicians have quailed and miserably failed to stand up to Islamist forces and social processes. In recent years a marked pusillanimous deference to Islam has found its way into the public utterances of all but a handful of our MPs.

If all of our troops were to leave Muslim states, Israel were to be destroyed and replaced by a Muslim Palestinian state, and Muslims to be shown preference over non-Muslims in all walks of life in the UK, we would not see an end to Islamist violence. Until the ideology of Islamism is completely rooted out and eliminated we will live under permanent mortal threat from its exponents. Its advocates are only encouraged in their violence and aggression by concessions, which they rightly interpret as evidence of weakness and political cowardice.

Still, returning to yesterday’s conviction of three aspirant suicide bombers, this also illustrates that to date our security agencies have been doing a good job of intercepting Islamist plots and preventing their bloody implementation. Whilst there is thus cause to celebrate due to the fact that lives have been saved through this good work, there is also cause for concern owing to the fact that on the same day the European Court of Human Rights put a block on the extradition of Abu Hamza to the United States to be charged with terrorism-related offences. It is quite clear that our approach to ‘human rights’ needs to be reformed so that it elevates the ‘human rights’ of those who have not committed and do not intend to commit crimes over those of those who have. As matters stand, this legislation is used as an enabler of Islamisation and mass colonisation of Western societies by hostile cultural elements.

Once again, I would like to reiterate that this is a matter that transcends race, and that the words of the woman interviewed in the following video (hat tip to Derby Patriot) amply testify to the fact that there are those amongst us of indigenous birth whom one can unreservedly identify as traitors. Whoever she is, she deserves to be stripped of her citizenship and expelled from the UK to make a new life for herself in a Muslim country. Such people are morally far worse than doctrinaire Muslims who were born into Muslim families, for whereas Muslims by birth have often known no other way of thinking, she has actively chosen to embrace and promote evil, and has turned upon her own people.

Deranged Englishwoman calls for Shariah

Ed Balls on Immigration and Turkey

Labour leadership candidate Ed Balls appeared on today's Politics Show and as in a piece in today's Observer claimed that he was concerned about immigration, although what he meant to say was that he was concerned that his constituents might not vote for him if he does not pay lip service to their views on immigration. As for lip service, his was about as mealy-mouthed as you can get.

Once again Balls used the Poles as the whipping boys in expressing his putative concern over the immigration issue, whilst simultaneously paying mandatory dhimmi tribute to Muslims by citing the distress caused to Muslim constituents in locations such as Dewsbury by immigration from Eastern Europe. When pressed by the interviewer to clarify his position on Turkey's entry to the EU, the necessary freedom of labour mobility and the influx of Muslim immigrants that this would entail and whether he though that this would cause problems for indigenous (although this word was not used) voters he refused to answer. He was specifically asked what he thought about the "socio-cultural (code for Islamic) implications" of such immigration, but once again refused to even acknowledge the question by claiming that this was not a 'race' (sic) issue and returning to an attack on the Poles.

In sum, reading between the lines, this is what Balls would have said in his interview with the Politics Show had he been speaking honestly:

• I am pro-globalisation, mass immigration and the UK's absorption into the EU
• I am going to talk about immigration so that the headlines will say that I am addressing the issue. To the unobservant eye of the casual reader this will equate to me thinking that mass immigration should be curbed and acting to curb it, although I aim to do precisely the opposite
• I like Muslims because they vote Labour
• I don't like Poles because they're white Europeans with traditional values. However, having said that, they're really useful in driving down domestic wages and increasing the profits of my rich chums in the business world
• Turkey's accession to the EU will generate a massive influx of Labour-voting Muslim immigrants into the UK and help to destroy the country's sense of identity

Ed Balls is another self-seeking careerist who cares not one jot for the well-being of the people of this country. Ed, I would like to award you with the title of Dhimmi Traitor on this special day - 6 June 2010 - to commemorate the betrayal of the values for which so many of our brave men died on the beaches of Normandy on this day 66 years ago.

Simon Hughes: Dhimmi Traitor

If you are considering voting Liberal Democrat and you are not a Muslim, think again.Watch this video of leading Liberal Democrat Simon Hughes prostrating himself before Islam. The man is demented. As he is a self-declared bisexual, he'll be finding himself thrown off of the nearest 'mountain' should the Muslims he is sucking up to take power during his lifetime. He gushes emotionally before his audience, praising Allah and Islam. The Liberal Democrats wish the UK to be Islamised. They want a deluge of Muslim immigrants. Liberal Democrats, Simon Hughes in particular, hate political borders: "We must end this nationalism. . .  We are God's people, and God knows no boundaries. . . You are not strangers, you are not aliens, you are part of this country."

His speech gets even worse: "We want you to be the leaders. . . . We need you to lead our politics and we want you to come forward to be part of that political leadership in this country." He wants to see Muslim ministers and a Muslim Prime Minister. We expect this sort of Islamic supremacism from a Muslim politician such as Shahid Malik, but from a Liberal Democrat? Simon Hughes has lost the plot. If the Liberal Democrats do hold the balance of power in a week's time (which in all likelihood they will) brace yourself for a rapid upping of the tempo in the Islamisation of our country, for whichever of the mainstream parties form the Government, there will be more legislation privileging Islam and removing our right to self-defence from this predatory totalitarian ideology.

'British Muslim Initiative' List of Parliamentary Candidates

The British Muslim Initiative (BMI – not to be confused with the Body Mass Index) has done us a favour by publishing a list of candidates whom you should not consider voting for under any circumstances. All are either Muslim or über-dhimmis. Other than the usual suspects such as George Galloway, Shahid Malik and Sadiq Khan, you’ll find such ‘luminaries’ as Glenda Jackson, Gerald Kaufman, Dominic Grieve and Green Party Leader Caroline Lucas (representing the most multiculturalist, anti-nationalist and pro-Islamist party of the lot excepting Respect).

Caroline Lucas and the Greens have, owing to their small share of the popular vote, avoided serious scrutiny, but it must be said that she is a dangerous authoritarian; a dhimmi dung beetle who would criminalise criticism of Islam and provide followers of this totalitarian death-cult with privileges vis-à-vis the rest of the population. She was a signatory to a letter that appeared in the Guardian on 25 March 2010 entitled ‘Islamophobia is a threat to democracy’. No Lucas, you are mistaken: Islam is a threat to democracy, you hemp-addled hippie.

Take a look at this list, and if you spot anyone that you’d ever hitherto considered voting for (unsurprisingly, I didn’t), take note and cast your ballot for another candidate, preferably one standing for the BNP. Failing that, vote UKIP or English Democrat.

Nick Clegg's Call to Prayer

Not only does Nick Clegg want the whole of the UK to be deluged by immigrants, but he is also vigorously courting the vote of the denizens of their most hostile and entrenched bridgeheads: the Muslim colonies that have sprung up like poisonous fungi in so many of our cities and towns. According to the Sunday Express, he thinks that the Muslim call to prayer (muezzin) is "a joyful thing" that should be broadcast over loudspeakers wherever those not-so-magnificent 'badges of our subjection' - mosques - happen to be.

Clegg, despite his professed atheism, thus demonstrates his alpha dhimmi status with this craven piece of politicking. An atheist actively promoting Islamisation? He's really not very bright, is he? Are you readying yourself for the scimitar's edge Nick?

James Purnell: Another Dhimmi Traitor

Hats off to James Purnell for fully displaying his obsequious deference to Islam on his constituency blog, and thereby confirming how utterly unfit he is for public office. He has done so by calling for the honouring of the memory of Robert 'Reschid' Stanley, a Muslim convert and twice Mayor of Stalybridge in the 1870s. Apparently, Purnell posted the article following a campaign within his constituency to give "full recognition" to this nineteenth-century fool who "may have been the country's first Muslim mayor." Now, I wonder who would have been behind such a campaign?

As well as being a brazen attempt to bolster his Muslim bloc vote, this selection of a minor facet of local history for public commemoration is symbolic of a dangerous shift in political power within certain areas of the UK brought about by the demographic displacement of the indigenous population. We live in a country where the mainstream media constantly reiterate the message that "we are a multicultural, multifaith and multiracial society" and, increasingly, that "we always have been". This is an out-and-out piece of pernicious tendentious distortion, but many people, particularly in the younger generation, are increasingly accepting it as truth. So, we can but hope that thanks to this piece of dhimmi posturing Purnell's constituents will be able to see him for the traitor he is: a man willing to sell out the interests of the indigenous population to hostile colonisers for the sake of his own political interests.

Electors of Stalybridge and Hyde remember: it is in your power to eject this English-hating traitor at the next General Election, and to ensure that views such as his do not destroy the future well-being and security of your children and grandchildren. Teach this man a lesson in humility, and ensure that office remains forever beyond his grasp.

To view Purnell's nauseating encomium in honour of the shameful former Mayor of Stalybridge, please visit http://www.jamespurnell.org.uk/james-purnell-backs-calls-to-honour-19th-century-mayor