Share |

Sunday, 30 January 2011

Lord Ahmed defends predatory Muslim Paedophiles

The Mail has today run an extraordinary story in which Labour ‘Lord’ Ahmed (another fake peer in the mould of bogus ‘Baroness’ Warsi) has spoken up in defence of predatory Pakistani paedophiles. Instead of blaming these despicable men for their repellent crimes, he instead has the gall to blame white English society, our women in particular, for the perpetration of these misdeeds. The pro-paedophile peer was speaking in response to the recent reporting of the phenomenon of on-street underage grooming of young English girls which has been conducted almost exclusively by Muslims, predominantly Pakistanis.

It is obvious to anyone who knows about Islam that such behaviour is not only sanctioned by the religion, but openly encouraged by the example of its founder. How many times have you heard that Mohammed was the perfect man and should never under any circumstances be criticised? How often have you heard it said that Muslims should seek to emulate his life and example? Well, given that Mohammed himself was a violent predatory paedophile who deliberately targeted unbelievers for his murderous crimes, why ought we to be surprised when those who see this individual as the ‘perfect man’ hold our children in contempt and abuse them for their debased sexual gratification? They are doing nothing more than being ‘good’ Muslims in the mould of Mohammed. Thankfully of course, many Muslims owing to their innate human decency choose not to follow the example of this pariah prophet, and I am not in any way seeking to impugn their good characters.

The pro-paedophile peer justified the actions of the Muslim child rapists with reference to the fact that a number of them had been forced into unhappy first-cousin marriages, but then he adds:

‘But they are looking for fun in their sexual activities and seek out vulnerable girls.’

He said Asian men resort to abusing young white girls because they do not want meaningful relationships with adult white women.

‘An adult woman – if you are having an affair – would want your time, money and for you to break up your marriage,’ the peer added.
So Ahmed, are you implying that our women should simply allow themselves to be sexually available to service your emotionally damaged co-religionists? You are are effectively demanding that our women give themselves up as whores to be abused whenever the lusts of male members of your soi-disant ‘community’ move them to search out an object of gratification. Your attitude is self-serving and repellent.

I am sure that with Ahmed and Warsi sat in the House of Lords our women and girls will be feeling very ‘safe’, knowing that they are to blame for the rapes, pimping and drug addiction that are forced upon them by Pakistani Muslim gangs in so many of our towns and cities. Derby, Keighley, Rotherham, Rochdale: all have witnessed this pattern of abuse. In how many other locations is this sad story played out? Well Sayeeda, thanks for accusing us all of Islamophobia. Remember, a phobia is an irrational fear. What is irrational about fearing men who follow a creed that urges them to systematically sexually abuse those who do not follow their faith?

If you have daughters and live in an area near to a Muslim population, my advice to you would be to ensure that they know from an early age that they should as a precaution keep away from Muslim males, and that they are aware of the historical character and crimes of Mohammed. Protect your children from predation, because I can assure you that our educational system is filling their heads with a bowldlerised vision of Islam which leaves them naively vulnerable.


  1. wow.. nothing has changed.. muslims are still barbary pirates..

    what do we do to pirates?

  2. Unfortunately Van Grungy, what we do with pirates these days is give them human rights lawyers or pay whatever ransom they ask for. I did however, appreciate the recent manner in which the South Korean navy dealt with Somali pirates: the traditional way, i.e. blow them out of the water.

  3. What very few people have dared mention (apart from Melanie Philips) is the Islamic supremacist justification for the Paedo Jihad.

    Of course you find pedophiles and rapists in all communities, but these are nearly always loners operating in secret, because pedophiles are despised and hated by normal people.

    However Islam is different . Pedophilia is socially acceptable in Islam because 'the perfect man' Mohammed was a pedophile. In addition, pedophile attacks on 'kuffar' (non-Muslim) children are seen as a legitimate form of jihad, inflicting humiliation and demoralisation on the children and their parents.

    The Islamic invasion of the West is one huge razzia (raid of rape and pillage) and Western children are war booty. Pedophilia is widespread in Muslim communities, with Christian children being the main targets. The pedophiles operate in well-organised gangs and networks. They are protected and encouraged by their wider communities and have for many years enjoyed immunity from prosecution so as not to damage 'Community Cohesion'.

    There are many forms of jihad, not all of which involve bombs and bullets. Sexual jihad, using rape and other forms of sexual humiliation and mutilation has been used as a weapon of war since the time of Mohammed. Humiliation of the non-Muslims is especially important to Muslims, and the Pakistani Sufi sects are obsessed by it. Here are some more examples of sexual jihad... More here

  4. Deport all muslims now! This behavior has to be severely punished. These are not civilized people.

  5. Too right!

    When Jack Straw made his comments, what disgusted me was the sheer amount of white, middle-class male commentators throwing their hands up in horror and crying "aren't British girls slappers!" One of the few to give Straw credit for what he was taling about was Yasmin Alibhai-Brown.

  6. Ed, I share your contempt for those "white, middle-class commentators" who inveighed against the sexual morality of our women. It's disgraceful. So far as I'm concerned, what adults do in private, providing that it is consensual and nobody is harmed, is their business alone.

  7. Just appalling. I agree with every comment here and would only add my hope that England can rise from this elitist-imposed slow death.

    AS a foreigner I hope to see the 'great' come back to Britain and showing all muslims the door would just about clinch it!
    Britain's leadership and media.... ?
    "First Up Against The Wall Come The Revolution"

  8. Hello Blue. Well, I think that the exit of doctrinaire rather than nominal Muslims would bring a significant benefit to the UK. I don't think that there can be much doubt about that (see shortly forthcoming post on Thilo Sarrazin's observations in connection with this issue in Germany).

    Britain's media and political ‘elites’ are certainly culpable in glossing over this and other related problems. Much of it I think is connected to the radical disconnection between the lives of ordinary voters and members of the media and political oligarchy, for the latter are sheltered from the negative impact of mass Muslim settlement, whereas the former are not. Furthermore, owing to the concentrated nature of our Muslim enclaves, only Britons who live in close proximity to these areas have a real grasp of the situation, for as you will note, the public elsewhere is familiar only with the officially sanctioned lies that are continuously drip-fed to them by the governing interest.

  9. I am appalled and horrified that nobody is protecting British children from these monsters.

  10. It is our mainstream political parties, media and education systems that let us down in this respect Robyn. The ideology of multiculturalism neuters the objective rational faculties of those who subscribe to its diktats, and thus these people search for any explanation other than the real one for the behaviour displayed by these predatory groups. It is systematic ethnic and national self-loathing that ultimately underpins this ideology and its attendant self-willed blindness to the phenomenon of Islamically sanctioned paedophilia.


Comments that call for or threaten violence will not be published. Anyone is entitled to criticise the arguments presented here, or to highlight what they believe to be factual error(s); ad hominem attacks do not constitute comment or debate. Although at times others' points of view may be exasperating, please attempt to be civil in your responses. If you wish to communicate with me confidentially, please preface your comment with "Not for publication". This is why all comments are moderated.