Last weekend Channel 4 launched its anti-UKIP pre-election
campaign with its docudrama ‘UKIP: The First 100 Days’, and yesterday evening
the BBC waded in with its own effort in the form of a fly-on-the-wall
documentary about local UKIP party members in Thanet South, where Nigel Farage
is mounting his bid for a Westminster seat in May. As was to be expected, the
documentary focused upon the more ‘colourful’ aspects of the lives and views of
the featured Ukippers, but to be frank, what was displayed was not so much
fly-on-the-wall as foot in the mouth, over and over again.
That the documentary focused more upon personalities than
upon policies was unsurprising (it has to be admitted that is hard to focus
upon policies when policies largely remain in a state of flux), but given the BBC’s
known hostility to UKIP, it would have been expected that those individuals
featured would have been a little more circumspect about how they behaved and what
they said. In fact, the documentary makers had to do little other than to stick
around and wait for certain individuals to politically hang themselves. This
was certainly the case with now former-UKIP councillor Rozanne Duncan who
stated “I really do have a problem with people with negroid features”, adding
that if she were to be invited to a meal where she knew a “negro” would be
present, she would decline the invitation. She then made some bizarre reference
to this aversion possibly having been acquired in a former life, saying that it
would be interest to undergo hypnotic regression to reveal the possible source
of the aversion. All of this was played out in the living room of the local
UKIP press officer which provided an arresting backdrop of a sea of ceramic
clowns; seemingly hundreds of them, for she and her husband were avid
collectors of the said items.
This brought to mind some of the other absurdities uttered
by another UKIP councillor, David Silvester from Henley-on-Thames, who claimed
that the floods of early 2014 were part of God’s punishment for the legalisation of gay marriage. Bizarre? Yes. Fruitcake? Yes. Does this mean that
UKIP’s concerns over the EU and mass immigration are bizarre and fruitcake? No.
It is exasperating that an aspirant political party that many are turning to as
a last straw to deal with these issues is repeatedly making ridiculous gaffes
because of the eccentricities of some of its members. If it is to succeed, it
has to ensure that its candidates are at least compos mentis, rather than as
ridiculous and sinister as a collection of ceramic clowns.
UP certanly does have some (to be chartable) 'colourful' characters wthn t.That former Tory councllor n Henley-Upon-Thames was franly nuts to mae that predcton of the effects of mang gay cvl marrage legal! UP really do need to ensure these nd of people are weeded-out or at least not allowed to be canddates. F they really want to be seen as credble and not just 'spolers' for the Tory Party mostly but also for the other bg two partes they need to not repeat the numerous mstaes of the BNP n ths regard. That was one of the reasons that party mploded.
ReplyDeleteBarry
It certainly does! That said, it has become clear in recent months that UKIP now appears to have some reasonable and articulate high-profile members who have been elected as MEPs. That said, they are well shot of that Amjad Bashir. I can recall when I first saw him interviewed on television, and just cringed at the rubbish coming out of the man's mouth. He was evidently a tokenistic appointment, but if he genuinely was selected upon the basis of 'talent', then UKIP really do have a serious problem.
Delete