So seemed to suggest a Channel 4 report this evening, and
with such a conclusion, I do not beg to differ. According to the Office for National Statistics, there were some 108,000 immigrants born in Somalia
resident in the UK in the 2011. This figure of course excludes second or third
generation Somalis, so the actual and much higher total of Somalis resident
here is not publicly available.
The arrival of such a large volume of Somalis has led to the
emergence of identifiable and notable Somali clusters in cities such as London,
Sheffield, Bristol and Leicester amongst others, and together with the UK’s
officially promoted ideology of multiculturalism, this weight of numbers has
allowed Somalis to maintain their insular identity, whilst at the same time
creating a sense of cleft identity amongst many Somalis born in the United
Kingdom who are cut off from the direct experience of their ancestral
motherland. The latter do not in many respects therefore feel traditionally
Somali, yet often simultaneously bear an antipathy towards British and more
widely Western culture; culturally ambiguous and uncertain, many British-born
Somalis thus find themselves in a deracinated anomic state in which criminality
can flourish.
To a significant extent, the fault for this situation lies
squarely with Whitehall policymakers and their prescriptions for what they see
as the utopian ideal of a ‘new’ Britain, in which anyone and everyone from
around the world may be perceived to be, and as accepted as being, as British
as anyone whose ancestors have been present here since time immemorial. This
naïve vision has resulted in the overgenerous granting of citizenship and the
promotion of social Balkanisation championed by the ideology of ‘diversity’,
legitimised through reference to a policy tool labelled ‘anti-racism’ which
rests to a significant extent upon the fatally flawed and anti-rational
Macpherson Report. The unwillingness of the British state and its agencies to
either acknowledge what should be the transient status of Somali residents, or
to compel them to adopt the most fundamental of our basic practices such as
speaking English and not practising genital mutilation upon their daughters,
has of course allowed Somalis to feel sufficiently comfortable to stay, whilst
not identifying with the host society and culture. Thus do we witness
remarkable levels of Somali unemployment – 31.4% for Somali men and 84.2% for
Somali women in the three months to June 2008 – and a notable statistical overrepresentation
of young Somali males in criminality.
Returning to this evening’s Channel 4 News report, it
focused upon a small group of young Somalis who had left England to reconnect
with their roots in line with their parents’ wishes, with the latter concerned
either that their children were becoming excessively westernised or were at
risk of falling into lives of crime. The report followed them to Somaliland,
the most peaceful region of Somalia, its relative prosperity standing in stark
contrast to the war-blasted images of the country’s capital Mogadishu. Here,
the return of hundreds of such Somalis to their ancestral homeland has become
increasingly familiar, with the locals even coining a term for such returnees:
dhaqan selis (“the rehabilitation community”). This term, unsurprisingly,
possesses a somewhat pejorative air, but the returnees have found that they
feel more at ease in Somalia than in Britain, although the lack of traditional
goat herding skills, admittedly difficult to acquire in Sheffield, London or
Bristol, served as cause for embarrassment for the young Somali men featured in
the report. Nonetheless, these young men were quite happy to remain in Somalia,
whereas a young Somali woman named Laila found the restrictions upon Somali
women somewhat oppressive and wished to return to England.
They're not here for the weather Duro - i would like to know the statistics for how many claim benefits and how many are gainfully employed? It's a bit difficult to do the latter when you have been chewing 'Cat' all day......
ReplyDeleteLaurie -
That's for certain. In all likelihood, looking at the statistics quoted above, it would seem that the majority are benefit dependent in one form or another. Somewhere in excess of 108,000 individuals do of course need somewhere to live, and thus must fill a large town's worth of desperately needed housing.
Delete