This evening, Channel 4 starts its series 'Alien Investigations' in which it examines a number of famous (amongst ufologists and cryptozoologists presumably, as I hadn't previously heard of them) cases involving the alleged discovery of 'aliens' here on our planet. Whereas advances in planetary science, biology and genetics suggest that our galaxy is likely to be teeming with life, at least of the primitive bacterial variety (it is rumoured that we me be receiving an announcement from NASA shortly regarding the discovery of signs of extant life on Mars thanks to the Curiosity mission), that is quite different to stating that we have been visited by creatures from another world. The latter cannot be ruled out of course, but the evidence to date is lacking. Whatever happens to be revealed in the programmes that comprise this series, they are ought to make for a few evenings' good entertainment, even if they do little other than shed a little more light upon the social, cultural and psychological aspects of the belief in alien visitation.
The clip below provides a flavour of the first episode.
Review of Part One
The clip below provides a flavour of the first episode.
Review of Part One
As anticipated, the programme
turned out to provide the best part of an hour’s engaging entertainment,
focusing as it did upon three alleged alien sightings, with two of them
furnishing specimens of the alleged aliens that could be subjected to
scientific examination of one sort or another. All three originated in the
Americas: the first from Metepec in Mexico; the second from the Cuzco region of
Peru, and the third from Montauk on Long Island in the USA.
Images of all three alleged aliens
looked intriguing, and it was the stories attached to the Metepec ‘alien’ that
proved to be of most interest. Eyewitnesses claimed that in May 2007 a ranch
hand was startled to discover the ‘alien’ captured in on of his rat traps
(which for all the world resembled a miniature early nineteenth-century
mantrap). In all, there were five witnesses who claimed to have seen it alive,
with the animal being described as about 19 inches long (the remains certainly
didn’t seem to be that large, so perhaps they meant to say centimetres) with a
hairless pink body and luminous eyes. It made a noise that nobody could
identify. The remains looked interesting, and a number of 3-D scans had failed
to ascertain what it was. Its spine bore some human characteristics and it
possessed humanlike hands, but no opposable thumbs (the thumbs were
incomplete). On the second night after its discovery, it was stated that the
creature was “drowned in acid”, which seems rather cruel. Drowning is bad
enough, but why also add to its distress by using acid? Another such ‘alien’
was said to have been sighted on the ranch eight days later.
Initial tests upon the Metepec
‘alien’ allegedly suggested that it may have possessed a ‘human mother’, and
the ranch owner where it was caught died two months after the event in a
freakish and explosive car accident. Conspiracy theorists attributed this to
alien revenge, whereas the more prosaic explanation centred upon a debt that he
owed to gangsters. In all, some six tests were conducted upon the Metepec
specimen, a number of them suggesting that its DNA was very close to that of
humans, and indeed it was, for the final test revealed it to be a marmoset.
Moreover, its skull matched that of a marmoset. Towards the end of the
documentary, Angel Nuñez revealed that he had faked the whole affair, using a
buffy tufted marmoset. Being a primate, it should therefore not come as a
surprise that its DNA was close to that of humans.
The Peruvian ‘alien’ was found at
an excavation on a mountain some 70 miles away from Machu Pichu amidst
‘fragments of meteorite’. The narrator noted the widespread belief amongst Peruvians
and traditional Inca culture that their origins lay in the stars. The mummy
that was discovered possessed a peculiarly elongated skull together with what
appeared to be adult teeth and yet an open fontanelle. A Peruvian Ufologist
named Dante Dios Tambini claimed to be convinced that it was an alien, and also
produced some alleged footage of a UFO (which looked as if it was simply the
product of pointing a handheld imaging device at the full Moon in daylight and
waving it about) and a picture of an alien (nothing more than a red blemish
atop a picture of a stone shack).
The narrator noted that skull
deformation of this sort had been practised in a number of cultures for at
least 9,000 years in Africa, including in Ancient Egypt. Closer to home, the
Huns too practised this type of skull deformation in the fifth century. The
remains of the Peruvian ‘alien’ were not submitted to testing, but according to
Dr Anna Williams, it appeared to be a deformed child of about the age of six,
judging by the state of its teeth. This seemed a far more likely explanation
than the artist’s impression of a large-eyed ‘grey’ (or ‘gray’ I suppose
Americans would term them) that was provided alongside the skull.
The third and final case was that
of the so-called Monatauk alien washed up on a Long Island beach in July 2008.
Once again, a number of conspiracy theories circulated, the most favoured being
that this (and two subsequent carcasses) were aliens, and another being that it
was the freakish product of US military experiments in labs on Plum Island that
from 1953 until 1969 conducted biological experiments focused upon the
poisoning of Soviet livestock presided over by an ex-Nazi scientist just to add
a little additional lurid colouration to the tale. Although the carcasses
looked odd, why anyone should have thought that they might be ‘aliens’ baffled
me. A number of zoologists concluded otherwise: partially decomposed racoons.
Not as exciting as an extraterrestrial, but a rather more convincing
explanation.
All in all, the programme
illustrated the public hunger for tales of alien visitation, a contemporary
phenomenon that could be said to parallel the mediaeval thirst for miracles and
visions of the Virgin Mary. It would seem that our own scientific age is giving
birth to its own set of folk beliefs, fuelled by a voracious media and the
general public’s desire for strange and fantastical tales.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that call for or threaten violence will not be published. Anyone is entitled to criticise the arguments presented here, or to highlight what they believe to be factual error(s); ad hominem attacks do not constitute comment or debate. Although at times others' points of view may be exasperating, please attempt to be civil in your responses. If you wish to communicate with me confidentially, please preface your comment with "Not for publication". This is why all comments are moderated.