Widespread disaffection with mainstream political parties
appears to have caused many people to despair of party politics altogether, but
for some, they have posed themselves the question: “Where can I find a new
political home?” Many have yet to move beyond this stage, for they have not
seen anything that appeals to them; but, at a guess, a natural political home
for some grassroots Liberal Democrats, disgruntled at their party’s partnership
with the Conservatives, could lie with the seemingly cuddly Green Party. Not
only are members of the two parties said to share a penchant for sandals, but
also a passion for open borders, multiculturalism and reducing our standard of
living through radically increasing the cost of the one thing upon which modern
life and conveniences are dependent: energy.
This weekend sees the Green Party hold its annual conference
in Bristol, its yearly opportunity to enjoy a fleeting moment in the media
spotlight (or preferably, candlelight derived from non-tallow based sources),
following its canny move of changing Leader one week in advance of the
gathering and thereby providing an extended period of media coverage. Gone is
Caroline Lucas, replaced by former Guardian Weekly editor and ex-Aussie Natalie Bennett. It is therefore unsurprising to find that her former employer is
offering the Greens - a 'new force on the radical left' - considerable coverage and support, in which it becomes evident
that most of Bennett’s political flak seems to be directed towards the LabourParty, whose voters she seeks to court.
Although the Green Party is still relatively small,
possessing in 2010 a membership of 12,768 (I hesitate to refer to “national membership”,
for as you will see below, Greens really don’t like the word “national”,
considering it to be a ‘nasty’, ‘bigoted’ and ‘racist’ term), it did manage to
win two seats in the EU elections in 2009, and Caroline Lucas succeeded in
taking the party’s first Westminster seat the following year in Brighton
Pavilion. In 2009, its size and degree of electoral success were roughly on a
par with that of the BNP (which subsequently went into terminal meltdown), but
unlike the BNP, the party has always enjoyed a degree of sympathetic media
coverage, which, owing to the radically destabilising nature of its policies
were they ever to be implemented, it really does not merit.
The Greens, somehow, have come to be thought of as the
‘nice’ party, and their general philosophical stance – anti-Western,
anti-national and anti-science – has for some inexplicable reason been deemed
to be acceptable; an acceptance indicative of a strong current of generalised
cultural masochism and misplaced ethnic and national ‘guilt’ that has polluted
mainstream thought and discourse in Britain today. If one song could be said to
encapsulate Green Party sentiment, it would be John Lennon’s tuneful but rather
sickly Imagine; a song justly parodied, owing to Lennon's and Ono’s lifestyle, by
a certain Reg Dwight, who was moved to write:
Imagine six apartmentsIt isn’t hard to doOne is full of fur coatsThe other’s full of shoes
Anyway, I digress. Returning to the Green Party, it would be
a great pity if voters were to remain ignorant of its actual policies rather
than its cuddly-sounding name and image, and were thus to mistakenly lend its
candidates their votes. People need to be made aware of what it actually stands
for, which really is not very pleasant at all; moreover, in reality it is not
very “Green”, for the policies that it advocates would lead to a significant
deterioration in our environment at home, as well as our general standard of
living.
There are many things deeply wrong with the Green Party’s
approach and policy platform, but two key aspects of its policy work strongly
against preserving the environment: its advocacy of an open borders policy and
ongoing mass immigration coupled with an unwillingness to recognise that only
the economically undeveloped peoples of Africa, Asia and elsewhere can solve
their own problems of overpopulation and resource depletion through the
widespread use of contraception. The Green’s immigration policy for Britain
would be a disaster. Taking into consideration the massive strains already placed
upon national infrastructure, housing, social services, water and food supplies
and our countryside by our ineffective immigration
regime, consider the implications of the following statements taken from the
Green Party website:
The Green Party reaffirms it's commitment to a liberal immigration policy. Everyone is equal no matter what the colour of their passport. The Coalition's policy of introducing an immigration cap restricts people's rights based purely on their nationality, harms the economy and is not conducive to a free and happy society. The Green Party is in favour of a real review of border controls that takes in the full benefits of immigration and stops treating those who are not native to the UK as a problem.
Green Party Policy Statements
MG300 We will work to achieve greater equity between the UK and non-Western countries. In step with this, we will progressively reduce UK immigration controls.MG405 Migrants illegally in the UK for over five years will be allowed to remain unless they pose a serious danger to public safety.MG420 We will resist all attempts to introduce a 'barrier round Europe' shutting out non-Europeans or giving them more restricted rights of movement within Europe than European Nationals.MG102 We are aware that, in the 21st century, there is likely to be mass migration of people escaping from the consequences of global warming, environmental degradation, resource shortage and population increase.MG430 We will produce and implement contingency plans for the future financial and other support of environmental migrants. We will encourage such planning by international agencies, non-governmental organisations, other countries, the European Community and local government.MG103 The Green Party recognises the contributions made by many migrants to their recipient area or community. We value the cultural diversity and intercultural awareness resulting from both temporary residence and migration.MG205 Migration policies should not discriminate directly on grounds of race, colour, religion, political belief, disability, sex or sexual orientation. Preference should not be given to those with resources or desirable skills.
When it comes to nationality policy, its objectives are
chilling:
NY100 Over the last decades, British nationality law has been used to restrict the number of Black people having the right to live in the UK while maximising the opportunities for white non-residents with British ancestors to retain this right. The Green Party believes that such nationality laws must be reformed.Objectives
NY300 We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a 'British national' is irrelevant and outdated.
The Green Party wishes to eradicate
not only the nation-state, but also any natural common affective bonds of
culture and kinship. Although it also portrays itself as being in favour of
women’s rights, it, like the rest of the hard Left of which it is in reality a
part, shows itself to be in league with a certain misogynist and anti-rational
creed named Islam. Speaking at the Muslim News Awards in April 2007, Green
Party Principal Speak Dr Derek Wall stated:
Islamic teachings work in a holistic system which recognises the interactions between the diverse areas of life and society such as economics and health, peace and conflict, within which environmental care is also integrated.
The emphasis on spiritual development, on our relationship with the world around us, means Islam has many things to teach the environmentalist movement.
There is a strong concern with environmental protection and sustainable stewardship in the Koran, which has something to teach all of us Muslim and non Muslim alike.
If you have ever considered voting
Green, I hope that after reading this small selection of Green Party policies
you will desist from doing so. If you are genuinely interested in conserving
our environment, protecting our countryside and following a sustainable
economic and demographic policy that does not entail destroying your standard
of living, a new political party will be launching very soon that will have
such concerns at the heart of its mission. For more information, return here in
the weeks ahead.
The Greens are waiting with arms wide open, just as in The Camp of the Saints.
The Greens are waiting with arms wide open, just as in The Camp of the Saints.
The Green Party: recycling bad ideas
Great post!
ReplyDeleteWhat people seem very reluctant to discuss is the National Socialist roots of the modern Green movement. The Nazis were into "blood and land"; the blood bit's been dropped, thankfully, but a sense of the sacredness of the land or the environment remains with the Greens, who are as illiberal in their liberalism as Hitler was with his left-wing monstrosity.
But if the Greens want to be taken seriously in their internationalism, they need to press for it internationally. I'll take them with less of a pinch of salt when they demand I have a right to go to Mecca and there buy a rosary and pray in a church.
Thanks Joe. I think that the Greens represent internationalism on steroids (or whatever their natural equivalent might be).
DeleteAs for the Nazi link, I think that that is tenuous; we may as well denigrate space exploration or motorways for their "National Socialist roots". For all, no matter what their political background, there seems to be an excessive recourse to the label "Nazi" or "Fascist" to express their dislike of people and groups holding political positions that they fundamentally disagree with. It would be better if we could use more appropriate language, for the Greens are by no stretch of the imagination "Nazis" or "Fascists", but their ideology is certainly totalitarian, for it is all-encompassing and thus seeks to politicise every facet of life. In this respect, it is structurally similar to a number of other ideologies that you will be aware of.
The Green Party is misnamed, for its primary concern is not protecting our land, its habitats and species, but with promoting the interests of the inhabitants of what used to be termed the "Third World". If it was genuinely interested in biodiversity, it would also acknowledge that human beings are rich in this respect, and would not seek to implement policies that would erase one branch of the human family: Europeans.
is that the green of islam?
ReplyDeleteit doesn't sound like the green of rural england!
Certainly not the green of rural England. Will it be a colour that appeals to Salma Yaqoob?
Delete