Earlier this month the Gates of Vienna blog was inaccessible for a
time, and yesterday readers were once again denied access. At the time of
writing a visit to Gates of Vienna (GOV) was met with the following notice:
‘This blog is under review due to possible Blogger Terms of Service violations and is open to authors only.’
The message is a little cryptic, but the fact that public
access to it has been blocked, temporarily or possibly permanently, indicates
that Blogger’s owners – Google – are susceptible to pressure to censor opinions
that are deemed to upset some people around the globe. Given the content of the
blog in question, it does not take a great deal to guess which particular
ideological constituency will have demanded that access be blocked: an Islamic
lobby group of one sort or another.
Some of the articles published on the GOV I have agreed
with, and others I have not, but agreeing or disagreeing with a set of opinions
set out on a platform such as a blog is no reason to have them either extolled
by all as ‘virtuous’ or condemned and censored for whatever spurious reasons
happen to be called forth by way of justification on the part of an ‘offended’
party. After all, to offend someone nothing more is necessary – at least in the
case of those who will not brook any dissent from their perspective – than to
disagree with their opinion.
Whether or not you happen to agree with the general thrust
and tenor of articles published on the GOV is immaterial: the decision to deny
public access to the blog strikes me as a violation of freedom of expression,
and that in itself is a sinister move on the part of the internet giant.
Although those who dislike GOV have attempted to smear it by association with
Breivik, who happened to cite it in his largely unread rambling ‘manifesto’,
GOV has not called for violence and in no uncertain terms condemned the actions
of the psychopath Breivik as soon as his identity became known. The blog
appears to be the latest high-profile element of the transnational
‘counterjihad’ movement to have been taken out. In the UK over the past 18
months we have seen Alan Lake/Alan Ayling dismissed from his job at the
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and Chris Knowles sacked from
his job with Leeds City Council for holding views deemed to be at variance with
its ‘diversity policy’. More recently, EDL founder and leader Stephen
Lennon/Tommy Robinson received a prison sentence for gaining entry to the US on
someone else’s passport, and a little over a week ago his relative and fellow
leading EDL member Kevin Carroll was arrested for what was alleged to be‘inciting racial hatred’.
As perhaps the best known of the ‘Counterjihad’ blogs,
taking out GOV strikes a blow against the loose network and movement that it
represents. It is a worrying development, for though it may be unpalatable to
what is deemed to be acceptable opinion, the concerns that it articulates with
respect to the various facets of Islamisation – particularly to the demographic
Islamisation of many European societies – are legitimate. Much of what has been
written on its platform differs little in its essential thrust from the
argument and evidence presented by respected journalist Christopher Caldwell in
his book ‘Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration, Islam and the
West’ published in 2009. Thankfully, unlike ‘Baron Bodissey’, Caldwell has yet
to experience the chill winds of censorship, but Google’s latest exercise in
apparent censorship poses the question as to how much longer such dissident
opinions will be tolerated. In and of itself, the decision to block access to
the Gates of Vienna would appear to bear ugly testimony to the blog’s
protestation that Islamisation constitutes a genuine danger to the freedom of
both speech and expression. We can only hope that Google relents, and allows the
blog to once again reach a general readership as it has done over a number of
years.
Note: thanks to Ivan Winters for drawing this to my
attention.
UPDATE
Immediately after posting this piece I discovered via the Infidel Bloggers Alliance blog that the Gates of Vienna has moved to a new site that can be accessed here.
UPDATE
Immediately after posting this piece I discovered via the Infidel Bloggers Alliance blog that the Gates of Vienna has moved to a new site that can be accessed here.
Gates of Vienna blog banner
BigBlogger is watching you - i wonder who has put 'pressure' with regard to this blog? You can't inflame Muzzie sensibilities now can you?...
ReplyDeleteLaurie -
Generally speaking, those of an Islamic persuasion tend to be exceptionally touchy and cannot tolerate the least criticism. To describe them as 'uptight' doesn't really get anywhere near capturing the violent nature of their sensitivity.
Delete@Laurie, my thought exactly.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how long it will be before Google/Blogger change their terms of service and actually state "any anti-islamic websites or those allowing such views will be closed down."
I won't be at all surprised...
Rob
They'll probably do it in rather a more roundabout way Rob, by branding all criticism of a certain ideology and its followers as 'racist' or 'xenophobic'. Gates of Vienna is now back up and running on blogger, but they have wisely migrated across to Wordpress. Blogger are now claiming that the GOV site was taken out by some sort of malicious code attack, but those behind the blog aren't taking any further risks.
DeleteOh, code attack was it, my arse it was.
DeleteStill, if Google want to start sending all the traffic over to Wordpress blogs, then that's fine with me. I wonder what it does for advertising revenue.
Personally, I think GOV should have done it about six months ago when Blogspot introduced its draconian T&Cs. As should you Duro, because you publish politically incorrect material that needs to be controlled.
The claim by Blogger/Google that the GoV site was taken out by malicious code is just an insult to the intelligence. Anyone who attempted to access GoV during the 'outage' was met by a clear message that the site was not available while allegations of breach of 'terms of service' were being dealt with. Is Blogger/Google saying it's own internal disciplinary systems are malicious code ?
ReplyDeleteIvan Winters