In the best tradition of John Snow’s “just a bit of fun”, I am about to introduce readers to the results of the past week’s readers’ poll as to their voting intentions in the forthcoming General Election. It may not come as a huge surprise that the results here diverge somewhat from the national opinion polls, but one characteristic is shared by both: the unpopularity of the Liberal Democrats. If this blog’s readers were to determine the future composition of Westminster the Liberal Democrats would be wiped out, for in total, 0% of this blog’s readers voted for them. Likewise, nobody declared in favour of either Respect or Plaid Cymru.
Turning to the ‘don’t knows’, readers are rather more likely
to know whom they wish to vote for than the electorate as a whole, with only 9%
stating that they do not yet know which party they will vote for on 7 May. Next
come four parties with 4% apiece: Conservatives, the English Democrats, Labour and
the SNP. Securing the support of 9% of readers are the Green Party, which would
become the official opposition in the House of Commons elected by Durotrigan’s
readers. However, storming home with a landslide majority are UKIP, who secured
the support of 61% of poll participants.
Thus, if we omit the ‘don’t knows’ for the time being, blog
readers would return a Parliament looking as follows: on the government
benches, led by Nigel Farage, would be 445 UKIP MPs, whilst leading the
opposition would be Natalie Bennett with 69 Green MPs. The Conservatives,
English Democrats, Labour and the SNP would each ‘boast’ 34 MPs. Somewhere, in
a far distant galaxy, perhaps this will be the outcome. As for here, well,
we’ll have to wait and see. Watch this space for election commentary.
In the meantime, please feel free to take part in the new readers’
poll ‘What will our Government look like after the 2015 General Election?’ which
has now opened and will run until next Sunday evening.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that call for or threaten violence will not be published. Anyone is entitled to criticise the arguments presented here, or to highlight what they believe to be factual error(s); ad hominem attacks do not constitute comment or debate. Although at times others' points of view may be exasperating, please attempt to be civil in your responses. If you wish to communicate with me confidentially, please preface your comment with "Not for publication". This is why all comments are moderated.