Should national broadcasters be permitted to run
'docudramas' with the intent of interfering in the political process during the
run-up to a General Election?
Last night's Channel 4 offering, 'UKIP: The First 100 Days',
was as predictable and dull as it was woodenly acted and blatantly partisan.
How could a review conclude anything else? (Admittedly, I've not read the
Guardian review, so it may well praise it for its 'objectivity' and great
'public service'). From the outset, it was obvious that this programme had been
commissioned and screened with no other intent than to portray UKIP as the new
'nasty' party; a party of not-very-closet 'racists', frightfully white and not
very bright. Although Channel 4 sometimes commissions and delivers excellent
documentary programmes, such as Dispatches, last night's drama could not be
adjudged to meet the broadcaster's often high standards, falling instead into a
knee-jerk pantomime Leftism, that characterised anyone with concerns about mass
immigration, the undemocratic nature of the EU or globalism, as racist,
xenophobic and innately stupid. If it was intended to be political satire, it
was about as funny and cutting edge as David Cameron delivering a stand-up
routine, or George Osborne shoving an unexpected tax demand in your face.
That its central character - a fictitious female MP of Sikh
extraction - should eventually 'see the light' and turn on UKIP, was a known
given of the drama as soon as the camera first alighted upon her. What else
could such a character do? The writer evidently thought that both she, and the
programme's viewers, needed to be awakened from their state of false
consciousness.
Although, obviously, the UKIP platform - so far as we can
make it out - being anti-EU, anti mass immigration and anti-multiculturalism,
lies in direct opposition to Channel 4's pro-EU, pro mass immigration and
pro-multiculturalism editorial stance, should this fact alone allow the
broadcaster to screen such a programme at this time? If so, surely for the sake
of political balance, we ought to see analogous documentaries dealing with the
other 'major' political parties operating across the whole of the UK? Channel 4
could portray Ed Miliband as an out-of-touch elitist intent on wrecking the
public finances, or David Cameron as a friend of transnational corporate
capital selling off the country's economic assets to hostile foreign investors;
Nick Clegg as . . . Nick Clegg, or Nathalie Bennett of the Greens as a vegan
totalitarian with a soft spot for ISIS (not the Egyptian goddess) and a desire
to extinguish Britain in an immigration tsunami from Africa and Asia? That
would strike me as being both as fair and as objective as the 'docudrama' that
we saw last night.
That complaints should have been submitted to Ofcom in the wake
of 'UKIP: The First 100 Days' is perfectly understandable. Will Ofcom take any
notice? What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that call for or threaten violence will not be published. Anyone is entitled to criticise the arguments presented here, or to highlight what they believe to be factual error(s); ad hominem attacks do not constitute comment or debate. Although at times others' points of view may be exasperating, please attempt to be civil in your responses. If you wish to communicate with me confidentially, please preface your comment with "Not for publication". This is why all comments are moderated.